Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Critical Care Medicine ; 51(1 Supplement):164, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2190513

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The reduction of mortality in COVID-19 has been clinically established only for Dexamethasone and Tocilizumab to date, but the overall mortality in COVID-19 remains high. Baricitinib is a Janus Kinase 1/2 Inhibitor with known anti-inflammatory and anti-viral properties. The US FDA recently approved Baricitinib for the treatment of hospitalized adults with COVID-19 requiring either supplemental oxygen, non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We performed a meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) and observational studies assessing the effect of Baricitinib on mortality outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHOD(S): A systematic literature search was conducted on electronic databases including NIH LitCovid, WHO COVID-19 database, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central from inception until June 30th, 2022. Randomized Controlled Trials and observational studies evaluating the efficacy of Baricitinib in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were screened for the assessment of all-cause mortality as the outcome. RESULT(S): Twenty-three studies (18 observational and 5 RCTs) were included in the mortality meta-analysis. Of the 16,390 patients (4,565 observational, 11,825 RCTs), 2,139 patients died (903 out of 7,610 in the Baricitinib arm and 1,236 out of 8,780 in the non-Baricitinib arm). Using the random-effects model, the odds of mortality in the therapeutic Baricitinib use showed a statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.90;p=0.008, I2=79%). A similar trend of decreased mortality was observed in the subgroup analysis by study design (Observational OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35-0.97, p=0.04, I2=83%;RCTs OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.93, p=0.01, I2=53%). CONCLUSION(S): Baricitinib used along with the standard of care treatments is associated with a reduction in mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 disease.

2.
Critical Care Medicine ; 51(1 Supplement):145, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2190509

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its hepatic manifestation, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) have a rising prevalence worldwide in the background of the ongoing global pandemic. It is imperative to explore the relationship with COVID-19 to improve patient care and treatment protocols for better outcomes. This metaanalysis aims to investigate the association between NAFLD and MAFLD with the severity of COVID-19 infection and the need for mechanical ventilation. METHOD(S): A systematic review of literature across 5 databases was conducted from January 2019 to June 2022. Observational studies or clinical trials were included. Studies that evaluated NAFLD/ MAFLD using laboratory methods, non-invasive imaging, or liver biopsy were included. The study protocol was registered in Prospero and Prisma guidelines were followed (Figure 1). Meta-analysis was performed on studies with mechanical ventilation and severity of COVID-19 infection outcomes using Revman software. The Mantel- Haenszel odds ratio was generated to describe the overall effect size using random effect models. RESULT(S): Mechanical Ventilation A total of 36,817 patients from twelve studies were included in the qualitative analysis. There were 5615 patients in the NAFLD group and 31,202 patients in the Non-NAFLD group. A total of 3148 patients with COVID-19 required mechanical ventilation;778 (13.8%) in the NAFLD group and 782 (2.5%) in the Non-NAFLD group with high odds of need for mechanical ventilation (OR 2.03, 95%CI 1.06-3.88, p-value=0.03, I2=95%) (Figure 2). COVID-19 Severity A total of 5286 patients from fourteen studies were included in the qualitative analysis. 2716 patients were in the NAFLD group, while 2570 patients were in the Non-NAFLD group. A total of 1,623 patients had increased severity of COVID-19;901 (33.1%) in the NAFLD group and 722 (28.9%) in the Non-NAFLD group. COVID-19 patients with NAFLD had worse COVID-19 infection outcomes compared to those without NAFLD (OR 1.59, 95%CI 1.12-2.26, p-value=0.01, I2=81%) (Figure 4). CONCLUSION(S): Our meta-analysis suggests that NAFLD patients had higher odds of needing mechanical ventilation or ICU admission and developing more severe forms of COVID-19 than Non-NAFLD patients.

3.
Critical Care Medicine ; 51(1 Supplement):145, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2190508

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) with COVID-19 is still an ongoing debate. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the impact of NAFLD/ MAFLD on the duration of ICU and hospital stay in COVID-19 patients. METHOD(S): A systematic review of literature from January 2019- to June 2022 on databases PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Science Direct, and Web of science was conducted. Observational studies or clinical trials were included. Studies that assessed NAFLD/ MAFLD using lab assessment, non-invasive imaging, or liver biopsy were included. The protocol of the study was registered in Prospero and Prisma guidelines were followed (Figure 1). The meta-analysis was performed using Revman software. Mantel- Haenszel odds ratio was generated to describe the overall effect size using random effect models. RESULT(S): ICU Admission A total of 37,109 patients from fifteen studies were included in the qualitative analysis. A total of 5624 patients were in the NAFLD group and 31,485 patients were in the Non-NAFLD group, where 3148 patients with COVID-19 required ICU admission. Out of these, 1098 (19.5%) were in the NAFLD group and 2050 (6.5%) in the Non-NAFLD group. We observed a significantly increased ICU admission among COVID-19 patients with NAFLD compared to those without NAFLD (OR 1.67, 95%CI 1.02- 2.72, p-value= 0.04). (Figure 2). Hospital Admission A total of 27,683 patients from three studies were included in the qualitative analysis. A total of 1128 patients in the NAFLD group and 26,555 patients in the Non-NAFLD group, where 4019 patients with COVID-19 required hospital admission. Out of these, 518 (45.9%) were in the NAFLD group and 3501(13.1%) in the Non-NAFLD group. We observed a significant increase in hospital admissions among COVID-19 patients with NAFLD compared to those without NAFLD (OR 2.71, 95%CI 1.10-6.70, p-Value=0.03). CONCLUSION(S): The NAFLD patients may have increased ICU and hospital admission compared to Non-NAFLD Patients. Fatty liver disease has an association with increased healthcare admission and critical care service utilization among COVID-19 patients.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL